Skip to main content
LibertyCES — Engineering Line Direct: Call James Riggins at (559) 395-5500 — 30+ Years Spec Experience. No sales queue. Real engineering answers.
Guides / Chemical Feed & Storage

Ferric Chloride & Ferric Sulfate Equipment Selection Guide

Ferric coagulants are a three-vendor equipment decision, not one. The tank has to be XLPE, never FRP. The metering pump and the bulk transfer pump are two different equipment categories with two different vendor spec sheets. I'm not going to collapse that into one generic "acid-resistant" answer.

Direct answer: Ferric chloride and ferric sulfate equipment is a three-vendor decision, not one. Storage tanks must be XLPE (crosslinked polyethylene), never standard FRP, which the chemical etches — rated to 50% ferric chloride and 60% ferric sulfate with PVC/CPVC fittings, EPDM gaskets, and titanium bolts. Precision dosing and bulk transfer are two separate equipment categories with their own spec sheets: Hayward Flow Control solenoid diaphragm pumps handle metering, while March mag-drive sealless centrifugal pumps handle bulk transfer, scaled in wetted material from polypropylene up to Kynar (PVDF) as flow and pressure increase.

30+ years spec experience. Send James your concentration, flow, and delivery temperature — get a real answer, not a catalog page.

Request a Spec Review →

If a quote for a ferric chloride or ferric sulfate system comes back with an FRP storage tank, that's a spec error — Poly Processing's own literature states plainly that FRP is not suitable for ferric chloride because it acts as an etching medium on the resin. Getting a ferric coagulant system right means three separate equipment decisions across three vendors, each with a different depth of published data: the storage tank (XLPE only, with hard concentration limits), the metering/dosing pump (rated at saturated concentration), and the bulk transfer/recirculation pump (mag-drive sealless, material scaling with flow and pressure, but no published hard concentration ceiling).

Storage Challenge

Why Ferric Coagulants Are Harder to Store Than They Look

Ferric chloride and ferric sulfate aren't just corrosive — they're also prone to separation and settling, and that tendency gets worse with temperature swings. These chemicals are frequently delivered at elevated temperature, which puts real thermal cycling stress on the tank as it expands and contracts. That's a direct reason XLPE (crosslinked polyethylene) is specified over standard HDPE: the crosslinked structure tolerates that expansion/contraction without losing structural integrity, where a standard resin is more likely to fatigue over repeated cycles.

There's also a vegetation hazard that doesn't come up with most stored chemicals: ferric fumes can defoliate surrounding vegetation if the tank vents outdoors without a scrubber. Poly Processing's recommended system for ferrics pairs four things: an IMFO® true-bottom-drain outlet (handles settled sludge and eases cleaning), heat pads/insulation (reduces separation/settling risk from temperature swings), a mixing system (prevents separation in the first place), and a scrubber if the tank vents outdoors.

Storage Tank

XLPE Only — FRP Is Explicitly Not Suitable

This is the single most important spec call on a ferric coagulant system. Poly Processing's own literature is explicit that FRP is NOT suitable for ferric chloride — it acts as an etching medium on the fiberglass resin. That's a real differentiator against generic FRP marketing that treats fiberglass as a universal corrosion-resistant material for aggressive chemicals; ferric coagulants are a chemistry where that generic assumption fails.

SpecValue
ResinXLPE (crosslinked polyethylene) — standard FRP is explicitly NOT suitable
Specific gravity rating1.65
FittingsPVC / CPVC
GasketsEPDM
BoltsTitanium
Ferric Chloride concentration limit≤ 50%
Ferric Sulfate concentration limit≤ 60%
Recommended outlet / systemIMFO® true-bottom drain (sludge control) + heat pads/insulation + mixing system + scrubber if vented outdoors

Source: Poly Processing chemical-storage guidance and Tank_Specs.pdf — the fitting/gasket/bolt spec is identical for both Ferric Chloride and Ferric Sulfate.

My rule of thumb: if I see FRP anywhere in a ferric chloride or ferric sulfate storage quote, I stop the submittal. Fiberglass is a correct choice for plenty of other aggressive chemistries in this project's data — that's exactly why it gets missed here. Ferrics are one of the few chemistries where the fiberglass resin itself is the failure mode, not just the fittings.
Metering / Dosing Pumps

Hayward Flow Control Z Series — Real Material Ratings, One Honest Gap

For precision metering — injecting a controlled feed rate of coagulant into a process stream — Hayward Flow Control's own 20-chemical resistance table rates the wetted materials on its Z Series solenoid diaphragm metering pump against ferric chloride and ferric sulfate. The PTFE diaphragm and EPDM seal option both rate A (Excellent) for both chemistries; the FPM/Viton seal option rates B (Good, minor effect) for both. Hayward's table does not carry a PVDF rating for either ferric chemistry specifically — a real, stated gap, not an assumption of compatibility — so confirm the pump-head material rating with LibertyCES before ordering at your actual concentration.

SpecHayward Flow Control Z Series
Pump / modelHayward Flow Control Z Series Analog or Digital Solenoid Diaphragm Metering Pump — 1-29 GPH across 3 size tiers (100/200/500)
Wetted material — pump headPVDF (one-piece molded) — no chemical-resistance rating published for ferric chloride or ferric sulfate specifically in Hayward's own table; confirm with LibertyCES before ordering
Wetted material — diaphragmPTFE — rated A (Excellent) for both ferric chloride and ferric sulfate
Seal optionsEPDM (rated A/Excellent for both chemistries) or FPM/Viton (rated B/Good for both)

The Z Series Digital model adds closed-loop pH/Redox Control dosing on top of Constant, Timed, and Proportional Dosage modes — useful for automated, feedback-driven coagulant dosing. Liberty previously specified Grundfos SMART Digital/DDA pumps here, which published a saturated-concentration rating and a high-viscosity "Slow Mode" specifically for coagulants; Grundfos left Liberty's manufacturer lineup as of September 2026, and Hayward's own literature doesn't document an equivalent saturated-concentration figure or high-viscosity mode for this line. On a high-viscosity or high-concentration ferric application, confirm actual dosing performance with LibertyCES before ordering rather than assuming parity with the prior spec.

Transfer / Recirculation Pumps

Mag-Drive Sealless — March Pump's 13-Model Ferric Chloride Lineup

Bulk transfer between tanks, tank-to-process feed, and in-tank recirculation are a distinct equipment category from metering — different flow rates, different duty cycle, different vendor. March Pump names 13 specific mag-drive sealless centrifugal models for ferric chloride transfer and recirculation duty. Mag-drive means no mechanical shaft seal, which March's own application copy calls out as eliminating the #1 leak-failure point on a corrosive chemical like ferric chloride. Wetted material scales up with flow and pressure across three real tiers:

Flow TierModelsWetted MaterialNote
Small flow (3.3–14 GPM)BC-2CP-MD, BC-2CP-MD 24V Brushless, BC-3CP-MD, BC-4C-MD, 320-CP-MDPolypropylene housings/impeller, Viton O-rings, ceramic shaft/thrust washersMax 50 PSI internal pressure across this tier
Mid flow (18–120 GPM)TE-5C-MD, TE-5.5C-MD, TE-6T-MD, TE-7R-MD, TE-8C-MD, 335-CP-MDPolypropylene retained for impeller only on the larger two (TE-6T-MD, TE-7R-MD); Ryton (PPS) housings/bushings mixed inTE-8C-MD adds carbon-filled PP rear housing at 120 GPM
Large flow / high pressure (82–200 GPM)TE-7.5K-MD, TE-10K-MDNatural Kynar (PVDF) housings and impeller; TE-10K-MD uses glass-filled Kynar impellerTE-10K-MD is the highest-pressure model in the lineup: 75 PSI, 160 FT head

Viton (FKM) O-rings/gaskets and ceramic shafts/thrust washers are constant across every model regardless of size — only the bulk housing and impeller resin change as flow and discharge pressure rise. The pattern is the same materials-of-construction escalation logic already documented on the tank side (XLPE over standard resin): as mechanical demand goes up, the vendor moves off its cheapest compatible material toward something built for more pressure and wear.

A real gap, stated honestly: March Pump does not publish a hard maximum concentration for ferric chloride the way Poly Processing does on the tank side (50%/60%). March's own guidance is qualitative — higher concentrations and higher temperatures "may make the pumps listed above unsuitable," and specific gravity above 1.1 requires a trimmed impeller — with a direct recommendation to contact March or a distributor before ordering. On a high-concentration or high-specific-gravity application, confirm the transfer pump selection against your actual numbers rather than assuming the published model list covers it.
Design Basis

A Real Design Basis, If You Handed Me a Ferric Coagulant System

If you handed me a ferric chloride or ferric sulfate feed and storage system to spec, here's where I'd start:

Related
Poly Processing SAFE-Tank & XLPE →Fiberglass (FRP) Tanks →Full Chemical Compatibility Chart →Storage Tank Category →Metering Pump Category →Magnetic Drive Pump Category →
FAQ

Ferric Chloride & Sulfate Equipment FAQ

Can I use an FRP tank to store ferric chloride or ferric sulfate?

No. Poly Processing's own literature is explicit that standard FRP is NOT suitable for ferric chloride — the chemical acts as an etching medium on FRP resin. That's a real differentiator against generic FRP marketing that treats it as a universal corrosion-resistant material. The correct construction is XLPE (crosslinked polyethylene), rated for Ferric Chloride at concentrations up to 50% and Ferric Sulfate up to 60%.

What tank fittings and gaskets are correct for ferric chloride/sulfate service?

Poly Processing's published system spec for both chemistries (identical spec for Ferric Chloride and Ferric Sulfate) calls for PVC/CPVC fittings, EPDM gaskets, and titanium bolts, on an XLPE tank rated to specific gravity 1.65. Worth noting: this is a different fitting material than the PP fittings Poly Processing specifies for hydrofluoric acid service — don't assume one fitting material carries across every chemistry in this vendor's own system design.

Why does ferric chloride storage need heat pads, a mixing system, and sometimes a scrubber?

Ferric coagulants are prone to separation and settling, and that problem gets worse with temperature swings. They're also frequently delivered at elevated temperature, which tests the tank's expansion/contraction tolerance — one reason XLPE's crosslinked structure is specified over standard HDPE. A mixing system helps prevent separation, heat pads/insulation reduce the temperature-swing risk, and if the tank vents outdoors, a scrubber is recommended because ferric fumes can defoliate surrounding vegetation.

Is the same pump used for both dosing and bulk transfer of ferric chloride?

No — these are two distinct equipment categories with different vendor data. Precision metering/dosing (injecting a controlled feed rate into a process stream) is a Hayward Flow Control Z Series solenoid diaphragm application — its PTFE diaphragm and EPDM/FPM seal options both rate well against ferric chloride and ferric sulfate per Hayward's own 20-chemical resistance table, though the PVDF pump-head material isn't rated for either chemistry specifically in that table (confirm with LibertyCES). Bulk transfer and recirculation (moving chemical between tanks, or circulating within a tank) is a March Pump mag-drive sealless centrifugal application — 13 real models spanning 3.3 to 200 GPM, with wetted material scaling from polypropylene up through Ryton to Kynar (PVDF) as flow and pressure increase.

Does March Pump publish a maximum ferric chloride concentration for its mag-drive pumps?

No, and it's worth being straightforward about that gap. Unlike Poly Processing (tank side, published limits of 50%/60%), March Pump's own application guidance is qualitative rather than a hard number: "higher concentrations and higher temperatures ... may make the pumps listed above unsuitable... contact a local distributor or March Manufacturing direct to review your application before ordering a pump." March also notes that a specific gravity above 1.1 requires a trimmed impeller. Treat that as a real limit of the published data, not something to paper over — confirm your actual concentration and specific gravity with March or LibertyCES before ordering a transfer pump for a high-concentration ferric application.

Spec Review

Specifying a ferric chloride or ferric sulfate system?

Send James your real concentration, delivery temperature, flow rate, and whether you need metering, bulk transfer, or both — I'll confirm the tank, pump, and material spec against your actual service conditions, not a generic chart.

Ready to buy or need a fast answer? Call, text, or email James directly — (559) 395-5500 · [email protected].